Why You Need Multiple Web Analytics Products

Web Analytics Options

A web analytics client recently conducted some market research to help them better understand the needs of their customers.

What they learned, though not entirely surprising to me, helped to confirm what I see as some of the key issues facing analytics customers today.

Two things are increasingly clear: Firstly, Google Analytics is now by far the dominant analytics tool, with fully 94% of web analytics customers using it on their websites.

However what's also clear is that many customers are using other web analytics products in addition to Google, in some cases products which are expensive and complex, which indicates that even though Google Analytics fills a critical need there are at least some business requirements that it doesn't (or can't easily) fulfill.

What Products Do Customers Use?

Web Analytics Products

The additional analytics products which customers use include Omniture (28%), WebTrends (17%) and Yahoo Analytics (11%), among others. There are a slew of lesser-known (but in some cases up and coming) products, such as CrazyEgg, Woopra and StatCounter.

We also found that 30% of analytics customers are not completely happy with their current analytics products, and a further 5% are actively dissatisfied with them. Clearly there are a lot of users out there who would like some better analytics.

Different Strokes...

Web Analytics User Communities

For most analytics customers, the analytics products they have are used by a variety of different user communities, including management (78%), marketing (78%), and various technical staff (75%). In view of this, it makes sense that customers would need multiple toolsets, as those tools which are powerful enough for technical users won't always be easily usable by less technical business users.

The Benefits of Web Analytics

Web Analytics Benefits

Web analytics tools are mostly used for the obvious reasons, including landing page analysis (97%), traffic patterns (92%), and website effectiveness (89%). However the key intangible value customers place on such web analytics are increased conversion rates (61%), enhanced website performance (44%) and better market data (42%).

So clearly the primary business reason that drives their use of analytics tools is to improve their website's performance and get more customers. That's not exactly a surprise, but it demonstrates that the real value of web analytics to most customers is to get more customers, not just more data. That's what "actionable intelligence" really means.

So What?

Putting this all together strongly suggests that there are two classic, somewhat opposing requirements at play here: On one side, the technical users of web analytics need a rich and powerful feature set to create more sophisticated statistical analyses and reports;  whereas business users want a web analytics package that can deliver actionable intelligence in an easily understood format - yet one that still allows them to quickly tease out the key pieces of information to improve their website and ultimately, capture more customers.

So the solution for many customers seems to be to use different web analytics packages to address the different needs of the multiple user communities within their organizations. And the companies that do so, are happier overall with their web analytics.

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Introduction to Web Analytics

So, you have a website. Your site is accessible from various search engines and other linking websites on the internet. Visitors are finding your site and viewing your content. But how do you know your website is performing optimally? More specifically, is your website doing exactly what you want it to do, as effectively as possible? It's a fairly basic question but, judging by how difficult it is to navigate some websites, it's an often overlooked consideration.

Any website is inevitably created with certain goals in mind, tacit as they may be. For example, at a minimum it suggests the goals that someone actually views your website and understands basic information derived from its content. A website created for a company or organization likely has specific core goals related to business functions. Often companies and organizations have a lot at stake based on their websites' performance of these goals. For example, the viability of a company which only takes sales orders online depends on the viewability, content, layout, and order-placement functionality of the company's website.

 

Because so much is often at stake regarding website functionality, a process has evolved for evaluating website performance. Web analytics is the process of quantitatively measuring the number of visitors, performance, and overall effectiveness of web sites. Utilizing analytics tools – typically software placed on an organization's web server – web analysis provides quantitative measurements, called “metrics,” about the site's accessibility, design, content, and efficacy. Use of these metrics allows a series of specific, measurable, business-driven performance goals to be specified for any website. Performance against these goals can then be used as the basis for business decisions about the website and, sometimes, even the business itself.

Web analytics tools generate a series of statistical measures (for example, summaries and averages) about how the website is being accessed and navigated. Generally speaking, the purpose of web analysis is to create actionable information gathered from two realms of focus: external and internal. The statistical measures related to how users a website is accessed, linked to, located by users, or related to the internet generally is external web analysis. All other statistical measures and analyses related to how a website is navigated, its content and functionality as viewed by visitors, how long visitors view specific pages, why they leave the site, and how performance goals are being met within the website itself is internal web analysis.

Most web analytics tools (e.g. Google Analytics) are very effective at external analysis, however very few provide an adequate set of internal web analysis functionality, so it’s important to select a web analytics tool (or a combination of tools) that excel at both. For example, with a typical e-commerce site it’s critical to measure and analyze the number of visitors who leave the site either because they can’t find what they want to buy, or because they get frustrated with the buying process. With careful analysis, the reasons for this visitor “friction” can be determined and its impact significantly reduced (and measured quantitatively).

Once organizations define clear performance goals for their websites, web analysis can be extremely effective in not only assessing website performance and functionality, but also wider considerations like company marketing campaigns and programs. Even non-commercial websites may set specific and tangible goals for its visitors (such as user registrations, surveys completed, views of relevant information etc.)

The key to effective use of web analytics is establishing clear goals for the website and accurate methods of evaluating performance – especially as they relate to business functions. There's little benefit in collecting wide-ranging metrics that are irrelevant to the desired performance of the website. For example, web analysis that focuses on how visitors link to the site but ignores the sequence of pages viewed, and the steps a visitor performs, to successfully place an online order, misses the mark. Successful web analytics depends on integrating the relevant external and internal metrics as they relate to clearly defined goals.

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

What You Don't Know Can't Hurt You… Right?

Here’s a scenario I come across much more frequently than I want to:  In a meeting discussing a new marketing campaign at a medium sized corporation, a typical marketing manager will say something like “We should put the call to action above the fold and to the right of the graphic”. My response (other than a silent internal sigh) is always along the lines of “How do you know that’s better?”

All too often their answer will come down to one of three things, either “I read somewhere that…”, or possibly “At my last company we…”, or my favorite, “Our customers want…” All of these answers are bogus, probably wrong and quite possibly harmful to the potential success of the campaign and also the company’s business. If they were really being honest, in most cases what this person should really say in response to my question is “I don’t know.”

The reason is that many otherwise smart people don’t use hard data to verify their assumptions. They don’t test those assumptions by running comparisons of the different possible approaches, or they don’t use the data they collect usefully, and they almost always don’t know their customer audience as well as they think they do.

The reality is that people are fickle and unpredictable, particularly customers, and particularly customers on the Web. What worked for one company and one product might not work for another; what worked last month might not work today; and how you think users will behave is not always intuitively obvious. That’s why it’s critical to always test, measure, and analyze any assumptions you make about your customers.

Of course in reality there are certain general principles about website layout and campaign management which hold true in most situations, most of the time (particularly with large, well-defined audiences), and experienced web marketers and designers know this. But it really doesn’t hurt to be sure. More than once I’ve seen seasoned web professionals eat their words when an analytics report disproved their pet theory… They didn’t know what they didn’t know, and some cases what they didn’t know can (and does) hurt them.

Part of the problem is that most marketing folks aren’t scientists and aren’t trained in the use of the scientific method, so the idea of constructing an experiment to determine the best ways to persuade their customers either doesn’t occur to them or is sufficiently daunting a task that they don’t know how to approach it effectively.

Another, bigger problem is that many of the software tools out there supposedly designed to help users test and measure website results are complex and ugly, and are really aimed at highly-skilled technical users with statistical and programming expertise (not a description of the average marketing manager). If it isn’t easy and obvious to obtain the analytics you need to make good decisions, then you’re probably making bad ones.

What’s needed in many companies and marketing departments is a mindset that it’s great to be creative and think outside the box, but always test (design A/B tests for all your assumptions), measure (using web analytics), and analyze (use analytics software that’s easy to use and presents information in a digestible form). Most importantly, use the analyses you create to drive your collective marketing and website decision making, so you’re always on solid ground and maximizing the effectiveness of the dollars you spend on both.

Because otherwise what you don’t know can hurt you… and it will, if you’re not careful.

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

6 Easy Steps to Improving Form Conversions

Web forms can a valuable tool for gathering information from your web visitors, but they can also be a gateway – or perhaps more accurately a closed gate – preventing or at least discouraging successful  Form Conversions, whereby users complete the form to either register on your site, or complete their purchase checkout process.  Because of this, forms can often be the most important pages in assisting (or limiting) the success of your web site.

Inevitably, some percentage of your website visitors will simply quit without completing a form. Why is that? Some quit because they’re really not that interested in your product or service, some just because of the unavoidable fickleness of human nature, but many of them quit because of the poor layout and functionality of the forms themselves, which is an easily preventable problem.

The goal of course is always to minimize the percentage of users who abandon the form and so maximize your user registrations and/or sales. This can be easily achieved if you follow the steps outlined below:

1.    Use a Web Analytics Tool

The first step is to perform a web analysis of your site to statistically measure visitor behavior, and so determine exactly how many of your site visitors are abandoning the registration or purchase process, and at what stage(s) they are doing so. To do this, you’ll need a web analytics tool. There are many third party web analytics tools to choose from, both free and paid, depending on your needs. Some of these products are much easier to use than others, so if you aren’t already using one check out this list of the Top 10 Web Analytics Tools.

Once you have installed such a tool and used it to accumulate some useful visitor behavior stats, you can utilize a powerful feature that some of these tools provide called Funnel Analysis to determine what percentage of users complete each stage of the registration/checkout process, i.e. advance from one page to another on your website, including your form page(s). Many people are shocked at how many of their visitors abandon the process at the form stage, so it’s really important to conduct a thorough web analysis using your web analytics tool to ensure your forms are well laid out, helpful, and easily readable, to give your visitors every incentive to complete the purchase/registration process.

2.    Keep Your Forms Short

Only ask your website visitors for the information you really need on the form. If your visitors are typical, they’re in a hurry, so don’t make them register on your site unless it’s absolutely necessary – give them the option to use a guest registration if possible.

You should also allow your visitors to complete a purchase or registration without a lot of optional fields cluttering the form, but if you must include such fields on the form, make sure it’s obvious that they are optional (a clearly visible asterisk is ok, but a visual cue such as a different font color or emphasis on the field prompt, or even including the word optional next to the field is much better). If the user might want to enter some additional information later, make it easy for them to do so by e.g. providing a link to their personal profile in your welcome email so they can easily update it.

Remember, the visitor’s primary goal is to get past the form as quickly as possible with the minimum of hassle to get to whatever it is that they were registering for or purchasing, so make sure your form helps them with that goal without wasting their time (your chosen web analytics tools should be helpful here).

3.    Make Using the Form Easy

Make it as easy as possible for your visitors to complete the form and move on to the next part of the process. For example, many sites ask registrants to create a unique user name. If at all possible let them use their email instead (which is guaranteed to be unique and memorable), but if you really want to offer them a user name choice, make sure that you give them feedback immediately on the form if that user name is available or not – otherwise they will spend time filling in the form, click the “Go” button, then get frustrated because the user name is unavailable (and maybe give up at that point).

Similarly, give them immediate feedback on any other information that needs to be in a particular format (for example phone numbers), but also don’t ask them to conform to arbitrary formatting requirements (e.g. “no spaces or dashes”). Instead be flexible by converting whatever they enter on the form (as long as it’s reasonable) to the format you want.

Also, don’t make users resubmit the form multiple times because they made one tiny error on one field. If there are any errors on the form they submitted, make sure you make it really obvious to the user what those errors are. Ideally put the error message in simple and easily understood English in a large, bold, red font next to the field in question, and/or at the top of the form.

One other essential requirement is to preserve whatever information that a user has already typed into a form – even if it contains errors, or if they hit the back button or perform any other similar action. If you don’t then you’re absolutely guaranteed to lose a lot of frustrated users this way.

Finally, make sure that you group related fields together on the form, and make sure that they’re linked in sequence – I’ve had sites where pressing the tab key on the Street Address field took me to the Age field, not the City field. Needless to say this is very frustrating for the user and will discourage many of them enough to abandon the form.

4.    Make It Really Obvious What To Do Next

This should be a no brainer, but you’d be amazed at how many web forms I’ve seen which don’t make it really obvious about how to complete the form and go to the next step of the process. A simple line of explanation at the top (and sometimes bottom) of the form is helpful and encouraging. For example: “Fill in all the fields marked with an asterisk * and click on the Next button below to complete your registration” would be a good simple explanation to the user.

On some sites it’s even hard to find the “Go” button to submit the form, which will definitely reduce your form conversions. If you don’t have a really big, obvious, highly visible, concise (and preferably brightly-colored) button at the bottom of the form saying “Register” or “Continue Purchase” or “Next”, or something very similar, then you should include one.  If your web analytics tools is showing that many people complete the form fields but don’t click on the “Go” button, then that’s a sign that the button is either hard to locate or is worded in such a way as to confuse and/or de-motivate your visitors.

Make sure that your links to the form match the title and purpose of the form. Nothing is more guaranteed to confuse a visitor than clicking on a link for a specific purpose only to arrive at a page that indicates it’s for a different purpose. If you need to use a single form page for two different processes (e.g. a form to enter name and address information), make sure that you make the title and other information on the form equally applicable to both processes – otherwise you should really separate them into two separate form pages, even if they are otherwise identical.

Finally, while it’s sometimes necessary to have a “Back” button to take the visitor one stage back in the process, or a “Cancel” button to cancel the process, those buttons should be relatively small and less obvious compared to the “Go” button – you don’t want to give your visitors any more reason to abandon the form than absolutely necessary, so remove all unnecessary clutter and distractions that aren’t directly guiding them to complete the process.

5.    Make Your Forms Look Good

Many companies lavish money on the design and usability of their sites, and yet somehow all of that is forgotten when it comes to their forms. Yes, forms are different from other pages (and in many cases are created by web developers, not web designers or interaction designers), but you can still apply the elements of style and layout to a form as well as the usability elements described above.

Simple things, such as creative use of colors and fonts, aligning fields, making the fields big enough (but not excessively large), and plenty of white space around the form elements are essential to a really good looking form. If your visitors enjoy the experience of looking at the form, it’s more likely they’ll enjoy completing it. So make sure you have your web designer modify the form layout once you’ve selected the relevant fields to make sure it satisfies the same esthetic requirements of any other page on your site, and you’ll increase the number of form conversion.

6.    Test, Test, Test

If you do nothing else with your forms, at least do this. Make sure you test every possible path through the form process from the perspective of the different categories of typical visitor (try to put yourself in their shoes), including what happens if they make a mistake of some kind. Also ask a few people (colleagues, friends or relatives) who are typical of each of those visitor categories try out the process to get their feedback – especially someone who is not familiar with filling out web forms! Thorough testing is the single best way to ensure that all your forms are as simple, friendly and effective as possible.

Finally, make sure you review the published forms periodically using your web analytics tool to ensure that you’re catching any other roadblocks or other problems that might still be causing your visitors to abandon the process.

Execute these steps regularly on your website, and you can be sure to minimize friction on your form processes, and maximize your form conversions and your registrations or revenue.

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Top 10 Web Analytics Tools (That Are Not Google)

Let’s face it, Google Analytics isn’t exactly the pinnacle of web analytics products. True, it’s free, and yes, it’s very widely used and well-integrated with Google AdWords (the fact that Google generates a lot of advertising revenue from AdWords certainly helps them to provide Google Analytics for free). But there are many great other web analytics tools out there that are not from Google, and many customers using Google Analytics also deploy some other tools to augment the basic Web Analysis functionality available in Google Analytics. So I thought it would be interesting to take a look at some of the other web analytics products out there and come up with a list of the Top 10 Web Analytics Tools That Are Not Google:

1.     Omniture (www.omniture.com)

Recently acquired by Adobe, Omniture is at the high end of the web analytics spectrum, providing a suite of tools for web site management, marketing and optimization. The suite includes SiteCatalyst, a Web Analysis and Performance Measurement tool, and Discover, providing information on website visitors and performance. Aimed primarily at large enterprise customers, the Omniture suite comes with a correspondingly large price tag and associated configuration, training and ongoing maintenance costs.

2.     Yahoo! (web.analytics.yahoo.com)

With its acquisition of IndexTools, Yahoo! Web Analytics provides perhaps the most significant challenge to Google’s dominance in the free web analytics arena. Like Google, it provides a basket of commodity Web Analysis functionality, but doesn’t stretch the feature set too far. The product’s primary draw is the scalability and the free price tag, although the goal is again to draw the user to Yahoo’s web advertising, in direct competition to Google.

3.     Overstat (www.overstat.com)

A relatively new player on the web analytics scene, Overstat provides sophisticated web analytics as unique (and very cool) 100% Flash-based overlays on top of your own web site that make it very easy to use. As well as basic web analytics reports, it also offers simple a/b comparisons, heatmaps, form funnel analysis and other advanced features for efficient web analysis and website review and optimization. Pricing is currently free (while the product is still in beta), but will ultimately have a free version and various paid options depending on page loads and support.

4.     Woopra (www.woopra.com)

Although currently also still in Beta, Woopra’s desktop tool, Live Tracking and Analytics product shows promise in the area of visitor tracking and commodity analytics. It has a variety of web analytics reports and other features that make it easy to perform a thorough website review. Although pricing is unknown at this point, it is likely to be aimed at the lower end of the spectrum.

5.     Coremetrics (www.coremetrics.com)

Coremetrics also provides a high-end suite of website marketing and management tools, including a web analytics product, with an emphasis on marketing optimization, merchandising, and website content analysis, integrated with marketing automation. Like Omniture’s suite, the Coremetrics product line leans towards the high end of both target customer size and price.

6.     ClickTale (www.clicktale.com)

Clicktale provides a hosted service for visitor analysis featuring a variety of basic web analytics features plus some more advanced ones, such as heatmaps. Their claim to fame is the ability to playback pre-record videos of user sessions to watch how the users move the mouse, scroll and click on your site. The pricing depends on the number of pageviews on your site and the level of support, varying from a basic free version up to several thousand dollars a year for the enterprise level product.

7.     Webtrends (www.webtrends.com)

One of the early players in the web analytics market, Webtrends also has a suite of tools for measuring and managing website visitor performance and advertising. Their Analytics product is still more aimed at the developer level or technical user, and although they have made progress with their user interface it’s still more suitable for larger organizations with a network of internal support and deeper pockets.

8.     Lyris (www.lyris.com)

As part of their search marketing/email marketing suite, Lyris (formerly ClickTracks) offers HQ Web Analytics, a campaign oriented web analysis suite, to measure the effectiveness of email and other online campaigns, and to better understand the behavior of visitors on your site. Features and Pricing are aimed at the higher end of the enterprise market.

9.     FireClick (www.fireclick.com)

The focus for FireClick is web analytics in conjunction with email marketing. Their Advanced Warehouse product provides real-time web analysis and ad-hoc reporting against an analytics data warehouse, and tightly integrates with their Advanced Marketing Suite. Pricing is competitive with other products in its class.

10.  StatCounter (www.statcounter.com)

StatCounter provides an invisible web tracker coupled with a hit counter, which can be installed on your site to offer detailed web statistics for web analysis and reporting. Pricing is based on the number of monthly page loads, with the lowest level being free, and pricing bands that increase from there.

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Welcome to Technorati

<a href="http://technorati.com/claim/7773ry7dw7" rel="me">Technorati Profile</a>

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Overstat.com Improves Web Tracking

I was recently given a test drive of the forth coming Overstat web analytics (OS for short) and user tracking package; in a phrase I'm impressed.  It is not trying to replace Google Analytics, Webtrends or Omniture but rather augment the visitor information in a visual format the leaders miss.  What I mean is that Overstat provides a visual representation of how visitors are actually using your site.  You can (and should) continue to use GA to track your Ad Word campaigns, but use OS to get a real feel for how users are moving througout your site.

What pages they move to, where on the page they click, what pages they exit from....and all of this is displayed directly over the actual web pages.  This differs from the standard stats packages that simply offer Spreadsheet style lists of the top pages, top links, etc.  Designers rejoice at finally being able to determine where on a page people are clicking (links or not) and what Click Paths are the most successful.  Usage trends that were hard to extract from lists are crystal clear when presented with thumbnails and overlays.

All of the regular statistics features are also included, but have been given a face lift with the help of Adobe Flash and Flex. 

Listen up folks (and you heard it first here)....this is going to be a game changer for Web Analytics and User Tracking.  Last I checked, they were still accepting Beta Registrants for free.

http://www.overstat.com/

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Do You Enso?

Have you tried Enso from Humanized yet?  Well, you should.  It is just about the greatest step forward for short cuts since, well, short cuts.  The premise is simple.  The software takes over your rarely used CapsLock key so that whenever you press it an innocuous promt appear over your desktop or on top of your open apps.  Enso is really two applications and I would recommend installing both, and both work by pressing the CapsLock.  So what does it do?  Alot, from launching apps via OPEN or OPEN WITH , to running calculations of highlighted text.  My personal favorite is the GOOGLE + keyword.  Two key clicks and I am browsing Google entries.  Fast easy and cool.  I am just touching the surface here and admittedly it does take a little getting used to but it will most certainly turn you from a power user to a super user in one click of the button.

http://www.humanized.com/enso/

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Windows Surface

Microsoft announced the inclusion of robust multi-threaded programming tools in its upcoming Visual Studio 2010 suite.  This technology is based on innovations from its Surface Computing platform.  Although this has been around for a while in tech time, multi-threaded development has always been problematic.  With the growing trend of chip manufacturers to keep up with Moores law, multi-core processors are really making these tools a necessity.  As far as I'm concerned these tools are best of breed and years ahead of the Open Source community.

Don't get me wrong, I love Eclipse but a thread-safe programming environment....it is not.

Keep an eye out for the VS 2010 public beta.

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/sep08/09-29VS10PR.mspx

Currently rated 3.5 by 2 people

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5